La mobilité des frontaliers du Luxembourg : dynamiques et perspectives
La mobilité des frontaliers du Luxembourg : dynamiques et perspectives
The main objective of this collection of research sheets is to take a scientific look at mobility in the Greater Region whilst presenting a certain number of facets, yet without neglecting the time factor, that is to say changes over time and in space of the behaviours and attitudes of the persons concerned.
Based on a wide-ranging survey carried out in 2010 and 2011 with a representative sample of cross-border workers in Luxembourg, the CEPS/INSTEAD has published, in conjunction with Forum EUROPA, the University of Strasbourg and the CNRS, a collection of articles devoted to the everyday lives of cross-border workers. It contains 13 sections on a range of complementary topics, which together form a synthesis of the main findings on the mobility of cross-border workers. One of the main findings of the survey is the significant increase in the use of public transport as a main means of commuting, even though car use continues to dominate. The quality of the public transport offer (journey time, services, reliability, comfort, etc.) plays a decisive role in cross-border workers' choice of transport mode, as do parking facilities at the place of work. Cross-border workers live an average of 44 km from their place of work and take 53 minutes to get to work. This distance from the place of work means that half of cross-border workers leave home before 7 am. 60% of car drivers say that they are satisfied or very satisfied with their commuting arrangements. Cross-border workers who take the train are generally more satisfied, with 74% saying they are satisfied or very satisfied. Furthermore, it is among those who take the train that fatigue makes itself felt the least compared to everyday perceptions in the different modes of transport. If 73% of cross-border households have at least two cars, generally opinions about cars are quite contrasted. But cross-border workers' mobility is not only limited to commuting for work, since one person in five crossing the border goes to Luxembourg for a non-work-related activity, mainly to eat out or to go shopping. On average, people crossing the border spend 2 hours a day and cover 100 km for all their movements.
In the foreword, this collection of research sheets introduces the challenge of cross-border mobility with Luxembourg. The challenge is this: the flow of people crossing the border to work keeps on increasing and the issues relating to mobility needing to be dealt with are becoming more and urgent, and all the more so as the great majority of cross-border workers use their own cars.
The collection is divided into the main parts, each of them then being subdivided into 13 sheets developing the subject.
The first part (sheets 1,2,3,4 and 5) deals mainly with mobility between home and the workplace. The second part looks in more detail at the everyday activities and entertainment of cross-border workers (sheet 6,7,8 and 9) and finally, the last part focuses on the opinions and day-to-day experiences of these workers (sheets 10, 11, 12 and 13)
First of all, after an analysis of the socio-demographical and geographical evolution of the population of cross-border workers, sheet 1 informs us that these socio-demographic profiles are changing considerably.
Indeed, cross-border workers are more numerous overall (up from 132,000 workers in 1975 to 352,000 in 2011), have aged notably and include a larger proportion of management-grade and therefore better qualified workers, with higher incomes and including more home-owners. In addition, this development has led to changes in daily mobility and residential practices, with a significant increase in home/workplace flows.
Section 2 deals with the issue of cross-border workers moving to Luxembourg for reasons to do with the distance between home and work. It can be seen, from a diagram produced a part of the EMF (cross-border worker mobility) survey, that this reason was not the main one, and that the reasons for moving are quite varied. Among the different reasons given for moving, was the desire to become a home-owner, housing-related aspects, financial difficulties/constraints, etc.
Sheet 3 provides information on the means of transport used by cross-border workers to go to work. Whether they live in Belgium, Germany or France, the great majority of cross-border workers choose to use their car. The highest rates of public transport use are in urban centres, where the connections to Luxembourg are the most efficient. Conversely, car use is more common in areas that are less densely populated and less accessible by train or bus, which is, however, where many cross-border workers live.
Then sheet 4 explains that cross-border workers live on average 44 km from their place of work and take 53 minutes to get to work. Although the distance has remained stable since 2007, journey rime, however, has increased slightly. The time spent travelling to and from work varies according to the modes of transports used.
Sheet 5, the last one in Part 1, tells us that over 18,000 cross-border workers use public transport to come to work in Luxembourg. Most of these journeys are into the capital. The majority of cross-border workers use car rather than taking the train, as already explained.
In Part 2, it is explained in sheet 6 that cross-border workers generate a high number of movements in Luxembourg for their work and for other activities. Cross-border journeys remain more numerous than journeys made entirely within the Grand Duchy, which are both shorter and most often made on foot. In total, cross-border workers spend an average of two hours a day on their daily travel.
The next sheets talk about the sequences of cross-border workers' activities during the course of the known day, thanks to the main movement chains of these cross-border workers, as well as their regular activities outside of their home-work commute, and the fact that these households have high level of car ownership, since three quarters of them have at least two cars.
And finally, the last pat looks at the opinions of cross-border workers concerning modes of transport, their perception of the energy question and their everyday experience of commuting. This last point takes up a large part of their time, leading to tiredness and stress, etc.
The quality of the public transport offer plays a decisive role in cross-border workers' choice of transport mode, as do parking facilities at the place of work. This distance from the place of work means that half of cross-border workers leave home before 7 am. Furthermore, it is among those who take the train that fatigue makes itself felt the least compared to everyday perceptions in the different modes of transport. However, the mode of transport most used remains the car, by a large majority.
Frédéric Schmitz, Guillaume Drevon, Philippe Gerber