Territorial Science Echo: Heterogene Energielandschaften in einer Grenzregion – Raum, Gesellschaft und Energie in der Großregion/ Paysages énergétiques hétérogènes en région frontalière – espace, société et énergie dans la Grande Région.
Territorial Science Echo: Heterogene Energielandschaften in einer Grenzregion – Raum, Gesellschaft und Energie in der Großregion/ Paysages énergétiques hétérogènes en région frontalière – espace, société et énergie dans la Grande Région.
This working paper presents the current comparative conclusions in France and Germany in the fields of energy, and presents the resulting challenges for the territorial development of the Greater Region.
This working paper highlights the thematic field of “energy” and presents the challenges which occur in terms of territorial development for the Greater Region. It discusses the energy transition concept and focuses on energy systems and vectors, specifically the development of wind energy and the production of energy from biomass with regard to the development of fossil energy in Germany and France.
The Territorial Science Echo concept was created in the context of the INTERREG UniGR-Center for Border Studies project in 2018. The UniGR-CBS is a cross-border network of approximately 80 researchers from the six member universities of the Greater Region University who work on borders, their significance and their associated challenges. The Territorial Science Echo is used for the cross-border transfer of innovative spatial planning knowledge which researchers of the Center for Border Studies of the Greater Region University (UniGR-CBS) possess; this pertains to politics, society and public administration, and specifically the integration of current research conclusions in the development process of a regional development concept for the Greater Region (SDT-GR).
The expertise of UniGR-CBS researchers therefore contributes to networking the regional development concept of the Greater Region (SDT-GR) through the INTERREG project. Cross-border regions are particularly adapted to the establishment of comparative approach laboratories and integrative strategies for spatial planning and development. These learning processes regarding spatial planning and development further strengthen ties between the responses of research to evolving framework conditions and the needs of society. The innovative conclusions of the UniGR-CBS researchers are therefore immediately made accessible for the practice of spatial planning and development, which strengthens cross-border governance in the field of spatial planning and consider it from a competitive viewpoint.
It is furthermore planned to make scientific discourses specifically usable for the SDT-GR. To this end, brief summary reports based on the current research conclusions of UniGR-CBS and representing five important thematic fields for the future development of the Greater Region, defined in agreement with the SDT-GR (“demography and migration”- “mobility, transport infrastructures and public transport” – “employment and economic development” – “energy” – “governance and external relations of the Greater Region”) and highlighting the challenges occurring in the Greater Region, were integrated.
These reports were drawn up by teams of authors from the six partner universities of the UniGR in all the thematic fields, with the guideline to present the results in a brief and understandable form and in a concise format (approximately 10 pages per thematic field). In November 2018, a common workshop for UniGR-CBS searchers and the scientific committee assisting in the performance of the SDT-GR, as well as for the parties involved in the Greater Region was organised. This workshop aimed to place the reflection on spatial planning in a scientific perspective. The thematic documents were published as part of the new series of UniGR-CBS working papers.
The dialogue initiated between UniGR-CBS researchers and the parties involved in the Greater Region is experimented through the SDT-GR project and should therefore be strengthened in the long run with the aim to guarantee future tasks related to spatial planning. In this context, it is planned to continue the Territorial Science Echo once INTERREG’s support ends as part of the UniGR-CBS.
Table of contents :
- Preface
- Introduction
- Wind energy in the Greater Region
- Wind energy in Germany
- The energy transition in France: nuclear and renewable energy
- The development of wind energy on both sides of the border
- Wind energy in Germany
- Wind energy in Lorraine: a restrained rise
- The use of biomass
- Biomass energy in Lorraine: great potential which has yet to be fully tapped
- Biomass in Rhineland-Palatinate
- Challenges for the Greater Region: the limits of the energy transition(s)
Depending on the level of analysis, the development of renewable energy focuses on various aspects: locally, decisions pertaining to the installation site essentially play a major role; however, these decisions have a supra-regional importance as evidenced by examples such as Cattenom or the storage of radioactive waste in Bure, which consequently leads to cross-border negotiation debates and processes. Socio-political convictions and preferences become visible in the form of elements constituting the production of new energy landscapes, particularly with regard to risks and technique acceptance or to individual parties’ courses of action.
What appears as important is therefore not only what policies implement in terms of renewable energy development (for example by offering incentives for current fed such as in Germany), but also whether the abandonment of fossil or nuclear energy systems is considered or not and what is the planned mode of transition towards renewable energy vectors. In Germany, two processes, on the one hand the opposition to nuclear power, especially because of the incalculable risks involved and the unresolved issue of nuclear waste, and on the other hand the abandonment of fossil fuels as part of the fight against global warming, are of particular importance for the German Energiewende. In France, however, the development of renewable energy is discussed against the backdrop of constant nuclear energy capacities.
At least two cross-border discourses are related to these specific energy landscapes. Firstly: how are risks negotiated from a cross-border perspective given the fact that the third largest French power plant is located only 12 km away from the German border? This question is especially important as the safety concept which is deemed obsolete can hardly be upgraded by modernisation works. Furthermore, critics and governments point out that the population density in Luxembourg and Germany is far more important than on the French side, and therefore risks are largely transferred beyond French national borders.
A second discourse pertains to the current and future cross-border electricity market. Germany relies on electricity imports and this reliance could be strengthened due to the abandonment of coal, which currently still plays an important role.
Beate Caesar & Karina Pallagst (Technische Universität Kaiserslautern (Hrsg.))beab
Antje Bruns (Universität Trier) et Michel Deshayes (Universität Lothringen)
https://doi.org/10.25353/ubtr-xxxx-fd9c-1f35